PVD's in the next contract - T-unionLink

PVD's in the next contract

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Faust
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 887

    #16
    The problem is that Rome Aloise and Peter Nunez who are still bitter are also known as fabricators.

    Comment

    • SoCalTeamster
      Member
      • Feb 2023
      • 17

      #17
      Originally posted by Faust

      The problem is that Rome Aloise and Peter Nunez who are still bitter are also known as fabricators.

      Comment

      • Faust
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 887

        #18
        Originally posted by local70teamster
        The members of the UPS National Negotiating Committee are bound by a Non-Disclosure Agreement they were required to sign by O'Brien, in order to participate in negotiations. Sean promised full transparency in his campaign and now has reneged on that promise. This is the same O'Brien, who with Ken Hall, entered into a concessionary back-room agreement with UPS, that allowed UPS to stop providing its superior Company health care plans that so many of our UPS members enjoyed.

        Well guess what, Sean has done it again with PVD's and it should be of no surprise to those who know O'Brien.

        There are many on the National Negotiating committee who think it's a horrible idea to give UPS PVD's, but they know if they go against what Sean has agreed to, they will be subject to harassment, retaliation and humiliation at the hands of Sean's repressive regime.

        But some members of the National Negotiating Committee are leaking out this information in the hope that the members will speak out and Sean will pull back on his PVD agreement.

        Karla Schumann of Local 104 was one of the National Negotiating Committed members who said she had no issues with PVD's, when asked by Sean. She's not going to put her IBT stipend at risk by saying no to this concessionary proposal. And that is true about many others UPS committee members on a stipend. The stipend is more important to them, then the interests of their UPS members.
        So did you make all this PVD news up, or was it true?

        Can you honestly say you aren't a Romeo or Peter Nunez supporter?

        Look Rome just brought down Mike Bergen and Mike Pharris of 166 and John Scearcy and Smith from 177.

        John Scearcy follows Ron Herrera, Paul Markwitz and Terry Han**** from the Vairma-Herrera 2021 Power Slate.

        Are Jason Rabinowitz and Peter Nunez next.

        One thing is for sure, everything Rome touches turns into dog shit!!!

        Comment

        • local70teamster
          Member
          • May 2023
          • 34

          #19
          Originally posted by Faust

          So did you make all this PVD news up, or was it true?

          Can you honestly say you aren't a Romeo or Peter Nunez supporter?

          Look Rome just brought down Mike Bergen and Mike Pharris of 166 and John Scearcy and Smith from 177.

          John Scearcy follows Ron Herrera, Paul Markwitz and Terry Han**** from the Vairma-Herrera 2021 Power Slate.

          Are Jason Rabinowitz and Peter Nunez next.

          One thing is for sure, everything Rome touches turns into dog shit!!!
          I know who those men are, but I don't know them personally. Whatever happened to them, or happens to them, is between them and the investigating officers.

          I don't believe agreeing to PVD's is in the best interests of our membership. Since Sean apparently declared on Twitter the Union will not agree to PVD's, then that's a good thing. However I am not the only one who is aware that Sean pushed for a PVD agreement. Hopefully this thread got him to change his mind.

          Best of luck Faust!

          Comment

          • Faust
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2023
            • 887

            #20
            I hope it did.

            Comment

            • local70teamster
              Member
              • May 2023
              • 34

              #21
              Sean is very upset about this thread, he even went off on the National Committee about it. We're glad at my workplace that this caused him to back off his PVD campaign. Oh, and thank you Sean for promoting Teamsterllink.

              Let's see what he tries to horsetrade next at UPS negotiations in order to get rid of 22.4's. It appears that Sean may have raised expectations that can't be met, with his campaign promises, I guess time will tell, and time's getting very short Sean.

              And Sean would be shocked if he really knew where the leaks are coming from, but local union leaders in an election year don't want PVD's to be an issue in their campaigns.

              Comment

              • admin415
                Administrator
                • Jan 2023
                • 24

                #22
                [QUOTE=local70teamster;n4563]"Sean is very upset about this thread, he even went off on the National Committee about it. We're glad at my workplace that this caused him to back off his PVD campaign. Oh, and thank you Sean for promoting Teamsterllink."

                We wondered what that surge in afternoon TeamsterLink registrations was about. Thanks, and thanks for alerting the membership.

                Comment


                • local70teamster
                  local70teamster commented
                  Editing a comment
                  And thanks for facilitating this forum to get information out directly to Teamsters Rank and File members
              • The Direct Line
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2023
                • 221

                #23
                I talked to a reliable source on Thursday, 5.25.23, and they told me that PVD is definitely on the table and agreed upon.

                Comment

                • Koldiww
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2023
                  • 191

                  #24
                  While some on this site choose to misrepresent and lie for whatever purpose, and refuse to see how the government controls oz in exchange for weaponizing the
                  DiGenova IIO, everyone should keep their eye on the issues. The PVD issue is a problem as OT, with the members, for time and memorial is "don't force me, but don't deprive me of it!?" Which means it is a dilemma for the negotiators. Obviously, the Union should support hiring new workers into the Bargaining unit, but if locals can't supply the people, the company finds them where they can. Easy for the company to cheat during peak!

                  Comment

                  • OT+
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2023
                    • 2105

                    #25
                    You do not have permission to view this gallery.
                    This gallery has 1 photos.

                    Comment

                    • Thisischange?
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 624

                      #26
                      Hard to tell who he's tweeting (negotiating) with here. Looks like he's talking to the members after putting his toe in the PVD water. Lot's of checks written, let's see how many clear the bank.

                      Comment

                      • Faust
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2023
                        • 887

                        #27
                        Originally posted by local70teamster

                        I know who those men are, but I don't know them personally. Whatever happened to them, or happens to them, is between them and the investigating officers.

                        I don't believe agreeing to PVD's is in the best interests of our membership. Since Sean apparently declared on Twitter the Union will not agree to PVD's, then that's a good thing. However I am not the only one who is aware that Sean pushed for a PVD agreement. Hopefully this thread got him to change his mind.

                        Best of luck Faust!
                        Any more updates on PVDs? I had another source say that the committee has agreed to limited PVDs.

                        That in itself will have automatic No votes.

                        The part-timers who organized for $25/75C/5% are gonna be a huge problem for O'Brien because they will also Vote No.

                        Comment

                        • Magruder
                          Member
                          • Apr 2023
                          • 52

                          #28
                          O'Briens last comment on PVD's "The Teamster utterly reject PVD' s... Got it UPS"

                          Comment

                          Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                          Auto-Saved
                          Smile :) Stick Out Tongue :p Wink ;) Mad :mad: Big Grin :D Frown :( Embarrassment :o Confused :confused: Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:

                          Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                          Collapse

                          Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                          Collapse

                          Could do this if you want

                          But it is a lot of code to write this and the user has to be an admin!

                          Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                          Collapse

                          Working...