Port Drivers Reject Teamsters 165 - 76 - T-unionLink

Port Drivers Reject Teamsters 165 - 76

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sasquatch16
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 104

    #1

    Port Drivers Reject Teamsters 165 - 76

  • Jazzman
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2023
    • 104

    #2
    Careful what you wish for. That had to be an embarrassing vote count.

    The laws about independent contractors are very unfair and make organizing next to impossible. Local 848 has been trying to change the situation for Port drivers for a long time.

    Thanks for posting this, as I don't have a Law 360 account.

    Comment

    • Faust
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2023
      • 887

      #3
      Isn't Eric Tate the head of that ports division? Didn't he replace Ron Herrera as the new Port Director?

      This is an embarrassing loss for Sean O'Brien.

      Comment

      • Sasquatch16
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 104

        #4

        Comment

        • Fudd
          Member
          • Jan 2023
          • 45

          #5

          Comment

          • Sasquatch16
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2023
            • 104

            #6

            Comment

            • The Direct Line
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2023
              • 221

              #7
              Very interesting article. Without knowing the details of how all this came about, we know that all you need to file for an election is 30% of the workforce. So probably locals 848 and 542 just got the minimum of 30%. Locals can not settle for getting 30% of authorized signatures, we need to strive for at least 60%

              Comment

              • David Brad Bishop
                Member
                • Jan 2023
                • 33

                #8
                Originally posted by Faust
                Isn't Eric Tate the head of that ports division? Didn't he replace Ron Herrera as the new Port Director?

                This is an embarrassing loss for Sean O'Brien.
                I believe O'brien dissolved the Port Division.

                Comment

                • Faust
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 887

                  #9
                  There's been campaigns where we've gotten over 80% signatures and when the workers voted barely 54% did so to join the union.

                  The union should not even try to push for a vote if under 80% do not sign.

                  Comment


                  • The Direct Line
                    The Direct Line commented
                    Editing a comment
                    Totally in agreement. You need to have an engaged supermajority.
                • BurnedbyO'Brien
                  Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 81

                  #10
                  Locals have autonomy with the IBT until they don't. O'Brien is making sure that those that didn't support him no longer have autonomy and finding ways to harass, strong-arm and retaliate against those Locals. It's happening all over the country. And yes, he should have been involved with this organizing campaign because he campaigned on organizing port drivers and has given many speeches over the years about organizing XPO. But incase you haven't been paying attention, O'Brien really doesn't care about anything but UPS and getting even with those that dare to stand up to him or his minions.

                  Comment


                  • working396
                    working396 commented
                    Editing a comment
                    From what I'm seeing folks are paying attention but laying low. It takes some time for word to get around.
                Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                Auto-Saved
                Mad :mad: Wink ;) Frown :( Big Grin :D Confused :confused: Embarrassment :o Stick Out Tongue :p Smile :) Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:

                Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                Collapse

                Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                Collapse

                Could do this if you want

                But it is a lot of code to write this and the user has to be an admin!

                Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                Collapse

                Working...