UPS to close down Portland facility... - T-unionLink

UPS to close down Portland facility...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Graveyard
    Member
    • May 2023
    • 81

    #31
    This is a very interesting thread and great use of this forum. Where else can we voice our concerns without fear? Nowhere except here!











    With TDU abandoning their core belief of publishing truth to power when there is misconduct at the highest levels at the IBT, the IDO slow walking or ignoring a valid complaint, visible support for the anti-union presidential candidate by most of the current IBT Leadership, and now Local Unions telling (OMG) active members that it will not grieve Article 6, Section 4 of the UPS National Master Agreement that gives the Teamsters the right to negotiate with UPS over new technologies and their effects on employees, or does it?

    Negotiate what? Impact?

    All this happened under the strongest union supporting US presidential administration.





    Too bad, they bought him, they own him, they should either continue to support him, or apologize to us for promoting. Not to do so is a sign of weakness!

    Comment


    • WTF891
      WTF891 commented
      Editing a comment
      Preach my Brother! Bad things happen to people when they remain silent.

    • TheMilitantTeamster
      TheMilitantTeamster commented
      Editing a comment
      Yep yep this post is some TRUTH

    • Tony R Cochran
      Tony R Cochran commented
      Editing a comment
      Local 162 has formally declined to process the grievance.
  • TheMilitantTeamster
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 457

    #32

    Comment

    • TheMilitantTeamster
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2023
      • 457

      #33

      Comment

      • The Direct Line
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 221

        #34
        GV-Grande Vista. UPS is dissolving combos. No protections.
        image.png

        Comment


        • Tony R Cochran
          Tony R Cochran commented
          Editing a comment
          Yes, I expect something similar will happen at Swan Island without action.
      • Tony R Cochran
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2024
        • 202

        #35
        Originally posted by The Direct Line
        GV-Grande Vista. UPS is dissolving combos. No protections.
        image.png
        Not only is there no resistance by local unions, there is active facilitation of UPS's plans.

        Comment

        • TheMilitantTeamster
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2023
          • 457

          #36

          Comment


          • working396
            working396 commented
            Editing a comment
            He's figuring you folks will be gone in a couple of years.

          • Faust
            Faust commented
            Editing a comment
            They can both go back to UPS.

          • TheMilitantTeamster
            TheMilitantTeamster commented
            Editing a comment

          • Tony R Cochran
            Tony R Cochran commented
            Editing a comment
            Ben will likely just retire. Matt, Bobby and Elijah can come back to UPS. The entire slate will lose after this debacle.
        • TheMilitantTeamster
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2023
          • 457

          #37

          Comment

          • TheMilitantTeamster
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2023
            • 457

            #38
            Hillsboro is doing 15k a shift ????
            ups thinks they can handle Swan Island

            Comment


            • Tony R Cochran
              Tony R Cochran commented
              Editing a comment
              Indeed, UPS clearly added us to the list at the last minute. Speculation says it's Danny Wright's spite; I would say it's a combination of spite, arrogance and testing the Local.
          • Tony R Cochran
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2024
            • 202

            #39
            1. Notification and Planning:
            2. Contract Enforcement:
              • Why has Article 6, Section 4 not been invoked in this case, especially given its explicit language on technological changes that diminish workforce numbers?
              • What steps, if any, have been taken to convene the National Teamster/UPS Technological Change Committee as required by the contract?
              • Why is the union facilitating employee transfers to Hillsboro before any bargaining has occurred about the Swan Island shutdown?
              • Are there guarantees for employees transferring to Hillsboro about seniority, building attachment, and protections against future layoffs?
            3. Grievance Timing and Strategy:
            4. Classification of Shutdown:
            5. Transparency and Member Involvement:
            6. Broader Implications:
              • What is Local 162 doing to address the potential precedent set by allowing UPS to automate and close facilities without adherence to the contract?
              • How will the union ensure stronger enforcement of contract protections against automation in the future?

            Comment

            • TheMilitantTeamster
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2023
              • 457

              #40

              Comment

              • TheMilitantTeamster
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2023
                • 457

                #41

                Comment

                • TheMilitantTeamster
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 457

                  #42
                  You do not have permission to view this gallery.
                  This gallery has 1 photos.

                  Comment

                  • Tony R Cochran
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2024
                    • 202

                    #43
                    any meaningful technological change that results in diminished numbers of workers, alterations to work conditions, or significant operational changes. Suggesting that only extreme scenarios like "humanoid robots" are covered renders this vital clause meaningless.

                    This misinterpretation fails to reflect the protections negotiated under Article 6, Section 4. If the union adopts this interpretation, it raises serious questions about its commitment to enforcing the contract. Opposition to Federal Involvement in Union MattersPotential Financial Liability for the UnionWhy Federal Action is NecessaryClosing

                    Comment

                    • Faust
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 887

                      #44
                      Are the Portland and Swan Island Hub(s) the same building or two separate buildings?

                      Comment

                      • TheMilitantTeamster
                        Senior Member
                        • Jan 2023
                        • 457

                        #45
                        Originally posted by Faust

                        Are the Portland and Swan Island Hub(s) the same building or two separate buildings?

                        Comment

                        Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                        Auto-Saved
                        Smile :) Stick Out Tongue :p Mad :mad: Wink ;) Frown :( Big Grin :D Confused :confused: Embarrassment :o Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:

                        Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                        Collapse

                        Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                        Collapse

                        Could do this if you want

                        But it is a lot of code to write this and the user has to be an admin!

                        Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                        Collapse

                        Working...