UPS to close down Portland facility... - T-unionLink

UPS to close down Portland facility...

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OT+
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 2105

    #1

    UPS to close down Portland facility...

    Current and recently retired UPS workers in California recently spoke to WSWS reporters on the ongoing layoffs and the refusal of the union to fight for workers.
  • Faust
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 887

    #2
    TDU member called out the sellout!

    Comment

    • WTF891
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2024
      • 477

      #3
      Yea, TDU..... the TURD.

      Comment

      • OT+
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2023
        • 2105

        #4
        Home X - 2024-12-14T111302.827.jpg
        "automation....unacceptable"

        Comment


        • X-TDUer
          X-TDUer commented
          Editing a comment
          How about the negative impact on ups teamsters that are getting laid off right now. Everyone saw this coming

        • Davis
          Davis commented
          Editing a comment
          O'Brien had a chance to do something about automation at UPS and didn't. The ILA is willing to strike to save jobs.

        • TheMilitantTeamster
          TheMilitantTeamster commented
          Editing a comment
          What a pos really
          The nerve of this man to say this as he is silent while his own members get automated out of employment

        • Thisischange?
          Thisischange? commented
          Editing a comment
          Historic douche bag. What a lying POS.
      • Tony R Cochran
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2024
        • 202

        #5
        as of today, no permits have been issued by the City of Portland for these renovations.This means there is still time to voice our concerns and advocate for a fair transition plan that prioritizes workers and the local community.

        We urge UPS employees, community members, and local officials to come together and take action:
        • Demand Transparency: Call on UPS to provide clear details about their plans and a timeline for changes.
        • Engage City Officials: Encourage the city to scrutinize any future permit applications and consider the broader impact on the Portland economy and workforce.
        • Strengthen Public Awareness: Share this update widely and build momentum to hold decision-makers accountable.


        Independent Teamsters Organizing Committee, Campaign to Save UPS Swan Island Jobs
        According to multiple reports from operations management insiders, the UPS Swan Island hub is slated to close for "automation renovations" in 2025. Security personnel have shared that some managers have already notified them they will no longer be needed after March, strongly indicating layoffs are imminent. While the company has yet to make an official announcement, these developments raise signi

        Comment

        • Tony R Cochran
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2024
          • 202

          #6
          Reminder: UPS needs permits, Portland is a union town, we have leverage and power. Do not let fatalism deter you from action. UPS Swan Island provides many good paying union jobs for the Portland Metro Area. Decimating the workforce will be taken into consideration during the permit process. We do not intend to go gently into the night.
          You do not have permission to view this gallery.
          This gallery has 1 photos.

          Comment

          • Ron Dans
            Member
            • Jul 2023
            • 23

            #7
            Seems like O'Brien and Trump have a few things in common! Apparently, their not so great at the truth.
             

            Comment

          • Faust
            Senior Member
            • Jan 2023
            • 887

            #8
            Originally posted by Tony R Cochran
            Reminder: UPS needs permits, Portland is a union town, we have leverage and power. Do not let fatalism deter you from action. UPS Swan Island provides many good paying union jobs for the Portland Metro Area. Decimating the workforce will be taken into consideration during the permit process. We do not intend to go gently into the night.
            What is your local doing?

            Comment


            • JWebb
              JWebb commented
              Editing a comment
              Probably trying to get rid of these "trouble makers".

            • TheMilitantTeamster
              TheMilitantTeamster commented
              Editing a comment

            • JWebb
              JWebb commented
              Editing a comment
              I can easily see them do nothing, its the path of least resistance.

            • TheMilitantTeamster
              TheMilitantTeamster commented
              Editing a comment
              Union is investigating
          • Tony R Cochran
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2024
            • 202

            #9
            Originally posted by Faust

            What is your local doing?
            To the union's credit, they have been investigating. Ben Vedus has been very responsive in getting information he has to me in real time. The problem is the contract. UPS is under no obligation to give Local 162 any information about these "change of operations" until the 45 day window. If jobs are going to be permanently eliminated, then we can have 60 days under the WARN Act.

            Here's what we are doing at the moment. We have a new City Council and Mayor. First step is talking to these elected officials about the permitting process and the larger problems associated with AI/automation job losses.
            The closure of the UPS Swan Island hub for automation threatens hundreds of jobs, with layoffs expected as early as March 2025. While we understand the role of automation in the future of logistics, its implementation must not come at the expense of workers' livelihoods. We are calling on the City of Portland to ensure a just transition that provides robust protections for workers and carefully ex

            Comment

            • JT67
              Senior Member
              • Mar 2023
              • 241

              #10
              Originally posted by Tony R Cochran

              To the union's credit, they have been investigating. Ben Vedus has been very responsive in getting information he has to me in real time. The problem is the contract. UPS is under no obligation to give Local 162 any information about these "change of operations" until the 45 day window. If jobs are going to be permanently eliminated, then we can have 60 days under the WARN Act.

              Here's what we are doing at the moment. We have a new City Council and Mayor. First step is talking to these elected officials about the permitting process and the larger problems associated with AI/automation job losses.
              You are living in a dream world.

              Comment

            • RJ162
              Member
              • Jul 2023
              • 6

              #11
              Originally posted by Tony R Cochran
              Reminder: UPS needs permits, Portland is a union town, we have leverage and power. Do not let fatalism deter you from action. UPS Swan Island provides many good paying union jobs for the Portland Metro Area. Decimating the workforce will be taken into consideration during the permit process. We do not intend to go gently into the night.
              We all appreciate what your doing, if nothing else your pushing Vedus. to do his job. Not to throw cold water but isn't the new mayor owner of a nonunion trucking company? Don't let the negative comments slow you down its about time someone did something to fight back.

              Comment

              • TheMilitantTeamster
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2023
                • 457

                #12

                Comment

                • Tony R Cochran
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2024
                  • 202

                  #13

                  Layoffs at one UPS facility are layoffs for all of us - no area, no shift, no building is an island. Our union leadership must answer hard questions this Sunday at 10 AM during the union meeting:
                  1. and will there truly be a net gain in full-time inside jobs with so many layoffs on the horizon?
                  Layoffs at one UPS facility are layoffs for all of us - no area, no shift, no building is an island. Our union leadership must answer hard questions this�Sunday at 10 AM during the union meeting: Why weren�t automation protections, like those supported for dockworkers by our union president Sean O�Brien, included in our contract? Why didn�t leadership act when they shut down the day shift, a clea

                  Comment

                  • Tony R Cochran
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2024
                    • 202

                    #14
                    Originally posted by RJ162

                    We all appreciate what your doing, if nothing else your pushing Vedus. to do his job. Not to throw cold water but isn't the new mayor owner of a nonunion trucking company? Don't let the negative comments slow you down it's about time someone did something to fight back.
                    Thank you. Let me be clear: I do not trust Ben Vedus. However, I don't need to trust him. Should Swan Island go, after the trauma of losing day shift, many full-timers and long-time part-timers will still be members. And they will be very displeased working split shifts or preload, or back to loading trucks at 50+ after 25 or 30 years at the company. So, if not for his own salary - he's not far off from retirement - then the survival of the Davison regime, Vedus must deliver something. Because if Swan Island goes, then Davison goes. The dominoes won't stop falling until the entire local is in the hands of rebels.

                    Comment


                    • TheMilitantTeamster
                      TheMilitantTeamster commented
                      Editing a comment
                      Now that they are getting rid of Swan Island will we get rid of Davison?
                  • Faust
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2023
                    • 887

                    #15
                    Originally posted by Tony R Cochran

                    Thank you. Let me be clear: I do not trust Ben Vedus. However, I don't need to trust him. Should Swan Island go, after the trauma of losing day shift, many full-timers and long-time part-timers will still be members. And they will be very displeased working split shifts or preload, or back to loading trucks at 50+ after 25 or 30 years at the company. So, if not for his own salary - he's not far off from retirement - then the survival of the Davison regime, Vedus must deliver something. Because if Swan Island goes, then Davison goes. The dominoes won't stop falling until the entire local is in the hands of rebels.
                    Why is it no one ran against the current administration?

                    Comment

                    Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                    Auto-Saved
                    Confused :confused: Embarrassment :o Smile :) Stick Out Tongue :p Mad :mad: Wink ;) Frown :( Big Grin :D Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:

                    Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                    Collapse

                    Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                    Collapse

                    Could do this if you want

                    But it is a lot of code to write this and the user has to be an admin!

                    Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                    Collapse

                    Working...