John Palmer information request, Re: TeamsterLink - T-unionLink

John Palmer information request, Re: TeamsterLink

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • OT+
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 2105

    #1

    John Palmer information request, Re: TeamsterLink

    Screenshot 2024-03-06 at 7.28.52?AM.jpg
    John Palmer Information request, Re: TeamsterLink
  • Nickjamesups
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2023
    • 332

    #2

    Comment

    • Wiggy
      Member
      • Apr 2023
      • 81

      #3
      Fred said they've been enforcing their copyright on "Teamsters" so Palmer asks for copies. lol

      Personally I can't wait to see the IBT's agreement with TDU.

      Comment

      • Watcher745
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2023
        • 116

        #4
        Did they license Trump to use it in all those photos being sold of his press conference?

        Comment

        • Graveyard
          Member
          • May 2023
          • 81

          #5
          Originally posted by Wiggy
          Fred said they've been enforcing their copyright on "Teamsters" so Palmer asks for copies. lol

          Personally I can't wait to see the IBT's agreement with TDU.
          The IBT's agreement with TDU is TDU's new larger paychecks and the reported office in the Mable Palace!

          Comment

          • killAInow
            Member
            • Jun 2023
            • 20

            #6
            Palmer information request, brilliant, finally a GEB member with balls. The rest should be ashamed.

            Comment

            • Tony R Cochran
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2024
              • 202

              #7
              Excellent questions raised by John Palmer. I am very curious about the vendor licenses.

              Comment

              • Jazzman
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2023
                • 104

                #8
                This whole thing should not be happening teamsterlink has been a great resource. Employing any firm engaged in union-busting can't be justified. At the next convention there should be a constitutional amendment to prohibit any dues being spent on any company or law firm engaged in "union avoidance" programs or union-busting. It would seem like that would automatically be the case for any union anywhere, but thats not the case in the Teamsters.

                Comment

                • Thisischange?
                  Senior Member
                  • Jan 2023
                  • 624

                  #9
                  As Mr. Spock would say, Logical Captain.

                  Comment

                  • DanaCos
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2023
                    • 970

                    #10
                    Think about it this way. These gentlemen paid their dues for YEARS and TDU has a couple month long Teamster (Fake Teamster) and people who aren't even Teamsters running a money-making business. Not only that, the members here are dues paying members.TDU shouldn't even be welcome at the marble palace that we pay for. The hypocrisy is way too obvious. They aren't protecting our trademark, they are trying to destroy descent.

                    Comment

                    • Faust
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2023
                      • 887

                      #11
                      This is as hilarious as when TDU exposed that Rick Middleton at Local 572 had purchased Walmart shares.

                      Comment

                      Previously entered content was automatically saved. Restore or Discard.
                      Auto-Saved
                      Wink ;) Mad :mad: Big Grin :D Frown :( Embarrassment :o Confused :confused: Smile :) Stick Out Tongue :p Roll Eyes (Sarcastic) :rolleyes: Cool :cool: EEK! :eek:

                      Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                      Collapse

                      Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                      Collapse

                      Could do this if you want

                      But it is a lot of code to write this and the user has to be an admin!

                      Unconfigured Static HTML Module

                      Collapse

                      Working...