Edgar Esquivel served with Letter

[OT+]

Screenshot 2024-01-22 at 7.10.48 PM.png
Edgar Esquivel served with Letter

[Mr. Teamster]

What did you do?

[Wiggy]

What did you do?

For one thing he wrote a damn good article telling the truth about O'Brien. The mighty OZ can't stand criticism of any kind. Your kidding yourself if you think this is just 952.

[Thisischange?]

Correct Wiggy, you know the manchild is behind this. Stand strong Edgar!

[The Direct Line]

In the same week as The Guardian published an article that was critical of SOB's meeting with the former president. Several days before both articles were published, three principal officers had a Facebook live discussion which was again analytically critical of SOB about his meeting with former president and also the racially discriminatory lawsuit. So this letter that was given to brother Edgar was not an isolated incident. Edgar has been a thorn on SOB's side for good reason. SOB is not a militant trade unionist, he is another business unionist. He is not a principled individual. He is no leader.

Has anyone seen that watchdog called TDU. Last time I heard, they were busy trying to silence Teamsters Mobilize during the TDU Convention.

[Thisischange?]

Is TDU even a thing anymore? Balless and spineless, for what? Money to fund their convention?

[JZuraw]

I disagree with many of Edgar Esquivel's views. But that letter from 952 is creepy bullshit.

[Tpost]

Somewhere, all the Teamsters Esquivel has targeted in his articles are smiling.

[Thisischange?]

No one say's you have to like him, but going after someone for speaking out is not just bullshit but it's what chickenshit cowards do. This kind of shit is why members sour on unions. Edgar calls his shot whether you agree or not that's his right. BTW he is usually right. Time for the cowards to grow the f**k up?

[JayCee]

Edgar is loving it. His martyrdom is almost complete!

[Koldiww]

The IIO/oz/TDU all used the internal processes to eliminate opposition from their run for office. Then they fired over 200 people so they could try to conceal their incompetence. Then they went after others for bs reasons to cower any future opposition. This is the newest version of shutting down any hint of members or officers opposing their BS. Get ready, the IIO won't do a thing.

[Mr. Teamster]

[Nickjamesups]

[Mr. Teamster]

Somewhere, all the Teamsters Esquivel has targeted in his articles are smiling.

[percap2high]

The IIO/oz/TDU all used the internal processes to eliminate opposition from their run for office. Then they fired over 200 people so they could try to conceal their incompetence. Then they went after others for bs reasons to cower any future opposition. This is the newest version of shutting down any hint of members or officers opposing their BS. Get ready, the IIO won't do a thing.

All true and more to come, as Esquivel points out, for OZ its a business and they own it.

[DanaCos]

I would tell that PO to kiss my ass. If a member wants to bring charges, it is on that member to do so. What does it even mean to bring reproach upon the union? Reproach is an individual basis. To request your appearance for an investigation is so uncharacteristic of a union. That's just like my local. Richard Hooker brought charges on a guy and held the hearing and he was the one determining guilt or innocence. The guy he brought these charges on ran against him. He personally asked someone to run against him independently after posting all over Facebook and announcing on Youtube that he hates politics. YEAH RIGHT!. Our union is so friggin' immature.